On Wed 08-02-17 13:02:07, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170207201950.20482-1-mho...@kernel.org > > Well, yes. It's simple, but from an RT point of view I really don't like > it as we have to fix it up again.
I thought that preempt_disable would turn into migrate_disable or something like that which shouldn't cause too much trouble. Or am I missing something? Which part of the patch is so RT unfriendly? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
