On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 07:19:21PM +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> 
> Looking at oom_kill.c, found that the intention to not kill the selected
> process if any of its children/siblings has OOM_DISABLE set, is not being met.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 
> Index: ankita/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ankita.orig/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c  2007-02-20 12:04:32.000000000 
> +0530
> +++ ankita/linux-2.6.20.1/mm/oom_kill.c       2007-03-15 12:44:50.000000000 
> +0530
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
>        * Don't kill the process if any threads are set to OOM_DISABLE
>        */
>       do_each_thread(g, q) {
> -             if (q->mm == mm && p->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
> +             if (q->mm == mm && q->oomkilladj == OOM_DISABLE)
>                       return 1;
>       } while_each_thread(g, q);
>  
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Ankita Garg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Linux Technology Center
> IBM India Systems & Technology Labs, 
> Bangalore, India   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to