On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:01 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Oops, sorry, you did say "in the includes". Yeah, that holds the same > > crap that I'm talking about. > > It's a simple and obvious solution that does exactly what it is > supposed to do. Why do you call it crap?
Yes, it's a simple solution. The reason I called it crap was because it does what the other hacks do. It hides from the developer a dependency that can create bugs in the other arch, and is not IMNSHO clean. When one works on one arch, you should not need to be worried about breaking other archs when you stay within the arch/ and asm-<arch> directories. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
