Hello

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 08:40, Nate Diller wrote:
> This little code snippet seems to have a page_lock recursion, in
> addition to overall looking particularly fragile to me.  It seems to
> be handling the case where a page needs to be brought uptodate because
> a partial page write is being done.  The page gets locked as many as 3
> times, each checking PageUptodate, however the two failure cases here
> go BUG() instead of returning an error. 

yes, these are to be returned errors

> I'm starting to think that 
> somehow the whole suspect branch just never gets taken, because
> otherwise I would expect to see bug reports related to -EIO, -ENOMEM,
> etc causing this to barf.

> 
[snip]
> 
> BOOM!!!

2.6.21-rc3-mm2 has this bug fixed.

>                 lock_page(page);
>                 if (!PageUptodate(page) && to_page != PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> 
> ---
> 
> NATE
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to