Hello On Wednesday 14 March 2007 08:40, Nate Diller wrote: > This little code snippet seems to have a page_lock recursion, in > addition to overall looking particularly fragile to me. It seems to > be handling the case where a page needs to be brought uptodate because > a partial page write is being done. The page gets locked as many as 3 > times, each checking PageUptodate, however the two failure cases here > go BUG() instead of returning an error.
yes, these are to be returned errors > I'm starting to think that > somehow the whole suspect branch just never gets taken, because > otherwise I would expect to see bug reports related to -EIO, -ENOMEM, > etc causing this to barf. > [snip] > > BOOM!!! 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 has this bug fixed. > lock_page(page); > if (!PageUptodate(page) && to_page != PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) { > > --- > > NATE > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/