On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:25:22AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> arm and arm64 share lot of code relative to parsing CPU capacity
> information from DT, using that information for appropriate scaling and
> exposing a sysfs interface for chaging such values at runtime.
> 
> Factorize such code in a common place (driver/base/arch_topology.c) in
> preparation for further additions.
> 
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@arm.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  - keep the original GPLv2 header
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig             |   1 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/topology.c   | 213 ++------------------------------------
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig           |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 219 +--------------------------------------
>  drivers/base/Kconfig         |   8 ++
>  drivers/base/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 237 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 423 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/base/arch_topology.c

Ah, so you want _me_ to maintain this, ok, I better review it...

> --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
> @@ -339,4 +339,12 @@ config CMA_ALIGNMENT
>  
>  endif
>  
> +config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
> +     bool
> +     help
> +       Enable support for architectures common topology code: e.g., parsing
> +       CPU capacity information from DT, usage of such information for
> +       appropriate scaling, sysfs interface for changing capacity values at
> +          runtime.

Mix of spaces and tabs :(

> +
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
> index f2816f6ff76a..397e5c344e6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_BUS) += soc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += pinctrl.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP) += devcoredump.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN) += platform-msi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY) += arch_topology.o
>  
>  obj-y                        += test/
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c1dd430adad2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
> +/*
> + * driver/base/arch_topology.c - Arch specific cpu topology information

No need to keep the filename in the file, you know what it is called :)

> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016, ARM Ltd.
> + * Written by: Juri Lelli, ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
> + * License.  See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
> + * for more details.

So, v2 only?  Please be specific.  Even better yet, use a SPDX header if
you want to, those are always nice.

> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/topology.h>
> +
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_scale_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +
> +unsigned long arch_scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)

Why do you have sd here?  You never use it:

> +{
> +     return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);

See?  What am I missing?

> +}
> +
> +void set_capacity_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long capacity)
> +{
> +     per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) = capacity;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t cpu_capacity_show(struct device *dev,
> +                              struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                              char *buf)
> +{
> +     struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev);
> +
> +     return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",
> +                     arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu->dev.id));
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t cpu_capacity_store(struct device *dev,
> +                               struct device_attribute *attr,
> +                               const char *buf,
> +                               size_t count)
> +{
> +     struct cpu *cpu = container_of(dev, struct cpu, dev);
> +     int this_cpu = cpu->dev.id, i;

new line for:
        int i;
please.

> +     unsigned long new_capacity;
> +     ssize_t ret;
> +
> +     if (count) {

        if (!count)
                return 0;

then you can get on with the rest of the logic.  Don't indent if you
don't have to.

> +             ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &new_capacity);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +             if (new_capacity > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +
> +             mutex_lock(&cpu_scale_mutex);
> +             for_each_cpu(i, &cpu_topology[this_cpu].core_sibling)
> +                     set_capacity_scale(i, new_capacity);
> +             mutex_unlock(&cpu_scale_mutex);
> +     }
> +
> +     return count;
> +}

No documentation for these sysfs file?  Not good :(

> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(cpu_capacity);
> +
> +static int register_cpu_capacity_sysctl(void)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     struct device *cpu;
> +
> +     for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +             cpu = get_cpu_device(i);
> +             if (!cpu) {
> +                     pr_err("%s: too early to get CPU%d device!\n",
> +                            __func__, i);

What is this going to help with?

> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +             device_create_file(cpu, &dev_attr_cpu_capacity);

You realize you just raced userspace, right?  Why do it this way and not
register the files when the CPU device is created/removed?

> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(register_cpu_capacity_sysctl);
> +
> +u32 capacity_scale;
> +u32 *raw_capacity;
> +bool cap_parsing_failed;

globals?  really?  That's bold :(

> +
> +void normalize_cpu_capacity(void)

naming is hard, but try to put a good, descriptive, prefix on everything
you are exporting in the same file, the same prefix.

cpu_capacity_normalize()?
cpu_capacity_register_sysctl()?

and so on.

> +{
> +     u64 capacity;
> +     int cpu;
> +
> +     if (!raw_capacity || cap_parsing_failed)
> +             return;
> +
> +     pr_debug("cpu_capacity: capacity_scale=%u\n", capacity_scale);
> +     mutex_lock(&cpu_scale_mutex);
> +     for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +             pr_debug("cpu_capacity: cpu=%d raw_capacity=%u\n",
> +                      cpu, raw_capacity[cpu]);
> +             capacity = (raw_capacity[cpu] << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT)
> +                     / capacity_scale;
> +             set_capacity_scale(cpu, capacity);
> +             pr_debug("cpu_capacity: CPU%d cpu_capacity=%lu\n",
> +                     cpu, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu));
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&cpu_scale_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +int __init parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)

cpu_capacity_parse()?

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to