4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]>

commit 391e2a6de9781e4906dd7e0b1cc097050bf43e11 upstream.

After the v4.2+ RCU conversion to se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist,
a BUG_ON() was added in core_enable_device_list_for_node() to
detect when the located orig->se_lun_acl contains an existing
se_lun_acl pointer reference.

However, this scenario can happen when a dynamically generated
NodeACL is being converted to an explicit NodeACL, when the
explicit NodeACL contains a different LUN mapping than the
default provided by the WWN endpoint.

So instead of triggering BUG_ON(), go ahead and fail instead
following the original pre RCU conversion logic.

Reported-by: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/target/target_core_device.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -351,7 +351,15 @@ int core_enable_device_list_for_node(
                        kfree(new);
                        return -EINVAL;
                }
-               BUG_ON(orig->se_lun_acl != NULL);
+               if (orig->se_lun_acl != NULL) {
+                       pr_warn_ratelimited("Detected existing explicit"
+                               " se_lun_acl->se_lun_group reference for %s"
+                               " mapped_lun: %llu, failing\n",
+                                nacl->initiatorname, mapped_lun);
+                       mutex_unlock(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex);
+                       kfree(new);
+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
 
                rcu_assign_pointer(new->se_lun, lun);
                rcu_assign_pointer(new->se_lun_acl, lun_acl);


Reply via email to