pick_next_pushable_task(rq) has BUG_ON(rq_cpu != task_cpu(task)) when
it returns a task other than NULL, which means that task_cpu(task) must
be rq->cpu. So if task == next_task, then task_cpu(next_task) must be
rq->cpu as well. Remove the redundant condition and make code simpler.
By this patch, unnecessary one branch and two LOAD operations in 'if'
statement can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 4101f9d..5abd9a52 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
* pushing.
*/
task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
- if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
+ if (task == next_task) {
/*
* The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
* eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
--
1.9.1
