Hi Chunyan, On 23/02/17 06:20, Chunyan Zhang wrote: [...]
>>> I noticed Juno use the 2), would you suggest that way? >> >> It is better to describe the HW component themselves rather than where >> they are in the topology - the address of the component will make sure >> the names are unique. So just the component type (etm, funnel, >> replicator, ....) and the address they are located at. >> > > OK. And to avoid making other person confused in the future, is it > better to revise juno-base.dtsi according to this convention? > Yes, it was noticed by Olof and should be now fixed for v4.11(already queued). You can check linux-next if you want to have a look before it gets merged. -- Regards, Sudeep
