Ingo Molnar wrote: >> what do you think about the idea i suggested: to do an x32_/x64_ prefix >> (or _32/_64 postfix), in a brute-force way, _right away_. I.e. do not >> have any overlap of having both arch/i386/ and arch/x86_64/ and >> arch/x86/ - move everything to arch/x86/ right now.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:06:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > No, no, please don't do that. It would make backporting patches > for stable kernels a real pain. Moving only the common files > is the right way to go for a first cut... As if the patches come remotely close to applying in the first place. The filename patched is the least of the worries. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/