On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 16:11 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Morton > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:54:55 -0800 Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > %pK was at least once misused at %pk in an out-of-tree module. > > > This lead to some security concerns. Add the ability to track > > > single and multiple line statements for misuses of %p<foo>. > > > > Should we also do this? > > Ah yes, good idea. Maybe "...when adding/removing new conversion..." ?
Deleting conversions seems unlikely.
