On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 19:29]: > > > > -void > > +int > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) > > { > > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file. Am I wrong?
Consistency within the file certainly makes sense. -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
