Hi Chao,

On 03/01, Chao Yu wrote:
> Both nat_bits cache and free_nid_bitmap cache provide same functionality
> as a intermediate cache between free nid cache and disk, but with
> different granularity of indicating free nid range, and different
> persistence policy. nat_bits cache provides better persistence ability,
> and free_nid_bitmap provides better granularity.
> 
> In this patch we combine advantage of both caches, so finally policy of
> the intermediate cache would be:
> - init: load free nid status from nat_bits into free_nid_bitmap
> - lookup: scan free_nid_bitmap before load NAT blocks
> - update: update free_nid_bitmap in real-time
> - persistence: udpate and persist nat_bits in checkpoint
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 109 
> +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 1a759d45b7e4..6c027b6833f4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -338,9 +338,6 @@ static void set_node_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> struct node_info *ni,
>               set_nat_flag(e, IS_CHECKPOINTED, false);
>       __set_nat_cache_dirty(nm_i, e);
>  
> -     if (enabled_nat_bits(sbi, NULL) && new_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR)
> -             clear_bit_le(NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(ni->nid), nm_i->empty_nat_bits);
> -
>       /* update fsync_mark if its inode nat entry is still alive */
>       if (ni->nid != ni->ino)
>               e = __lookup_nat_cache(nm_i, ni->ino);
> @@ -1920,58 +1917,6 @@ static void scan_free_nid_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> *sbi)
>       up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static int scan_nat_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> -{
> -     struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> -     struct page *page;
> -     unsigned int i = 0;
> -     nid_t nid;
> -
> -     if (!enabled_nat_bits(sbi, NULL))
> -             return -EAGAIN;
> -
> -     down_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> -check_empty:
> -     i = find_next_bit_le(nm_i->empty_nat_bits, nm_i->nat_blocks, i);
> -     if (i >= nm_i->nat_blocks) {
> -             i = 0;
> -             goto check_partial;
> -     }
> -
> -     for (nid = i * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; nid < (i + 1) * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> -                                                                     nid++) {
> -             if (unlikely(nid >= nm_i->max_nid))
> -                     break;
> -             add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true);
> -     }
> -
> -     if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] >= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
> -             goto out;
> -     i++;
> -     goto check_empty;
> -
> -check_partial:
> -     i = find_next_zero_bit_le(nm_i->full_nat_bits, nm_i->nat_blocks, i);
> -     if (i >= nm_i->nat_blocks) {
> -             disable_nat_bits(sbi, true);
> -             up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> -             return -EINVAL;
> -     }
> -
> -     nid = i * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> -     page = get_current_nat_page(sbi, nid);
> -     scan_nat_page(sbi, page, nid);
> -     f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> -
> -     if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] < MAX_FREE_NIDS) {
> -             i++;
> -             goto check_partial;
> -     }
> -out:
> -     up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> -     return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, bool 
> mount)
>  {
>       struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> @@ -1993,21 +1938,6 @@ static void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> *sbi, bool sync, bool mount)
>  
>               if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST])
>                       return;
> -
> -             /* try to find free nids with nat_bits */
> -             if (!scan_nat_bits(sbi) && nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST])
> -                     return;
> -     }
> -
> -     /* find next valid candidate */
> -     if (enabled_nat_bits(sbi, NULL)) {
> -             int idx = find_next_zero_bit_le(nm_i->full_nat_bits,
> -                                     nm_i->nat_blocks, 0);
> -
> -             if (idx >= nm_i->nat_blocks)
> -                     set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> -             else
> -                     nid = idx * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
>       }
>  
>       /* readahead nat pages to be scanned */
> @@ -2590,6 +2520,41 @@ static int __get_nat_bitmaps(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +inline void load_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> +{
> +     struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> +     unsigned int i = 0;
> +     nid_t nid, last_nid;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < nm_i->nat_blocks; i++) {
> +             i = find_next_bit_le(nm_i->empty_nat_bits, nm_i->nat_blocks, i);
> +             if (i >= nm_i->nat_blocks)
> +                     break;
> +
> +             set_bit_le(i, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap);
> +
> +             nid = i * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> +             last_nid = (i + 1) * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> +
> +             for (; nid < last_nid; nid++)
> +                     update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true, true);
> +     }
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < nm_i->nat_blocks; i++) {
> +             i = find_next_bit_le(nm_i->full_nat_bits, nm_i->nat_blocks, i);
> +             if (i >= nm_i->nat_blocks)
> +                     break;
> +
> +             set_bit_le(i, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap);
> +
> +             nid = i * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> +             last_nid = (i + 1) * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> +
> +             for (; nid < last_nid; nid++)
> +                     update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, false, true);
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  {
>       struct f2fs_super_block *sb_raw = F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi);
> @@ -2672,6 +2637,10 @@ int init_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  
>       spin_lock_init(&nm_i->free_nid_lock);
>  
> +     /* load free nid status from nat_bits table */
> +     if (enabled_nat_bits(sbi, NULL))
> +             load_free_nid_bitmap(sbi);

This should be done after init_free_nid_cache() to avoid NULL pointer access.
And, it shows little bit long latency during mount, so needs to take a look at
bit ops.

Thanks,

> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.8.2.295.g3f1c1d0

Reply via email to