Hi Andrew, On 02/03/17 18:24, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>>> Hi Enric >>>> >>>> Maybe you should remember that you need to use smaller transfers? If >>>> you don't remember, but use the full size message every time and only >>>> drop back on error, the i2c core is going to log rate limited >>>> messages. By remembering, there will only be one such message in the >>>> log. >>>> >> > >> Maybe I did not explain well but this is what the code does, when >> i2c-core fails with -EOPNOTSUPP because the msg is too long for this >> adapter it loop with a smaller chunk of fixed size, so you only see >> the i2c-core message once. > > Hi Enric > > Would it not be more accurate to say, that you only see the i2c-core > message once, for this transfer request. Is the next transfer request > again going to use the longer length? then fail, maybe generate > another i2c core message, depending on rate limiting, and then use the > lower message size? I think it does. > > Which is why i suggested remembering the length. >
Ah ok, sorry I did not understand you, got it now. Yes, so with this every time you do, i.e. a tpm_getpubek, you will see the i2c-core message, right. Thanks. Sounds a good suggestion for me. Cheers, Enric > Andrew >
