On Wed, 21 March 2007 12:57:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 12:35 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote: > > Even if such flashes still contain a bootloader and a kernel, that will > > occupy less than 1% of the device. Wear leveling across the device is > > fairly pointless here. This is what I designed LogFS for. > > Still you need to have a solution for handling bitflips in those > bootloader and kernel areas.
Correct. It may make sense to use UBI for that, I don't know. What I do know is that UBI cannot make wear leveling decisions as well as LogFS. And that is all I care about wrt. this discussion. Jörn -- Joern's library part 8: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/plank97tutorial.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
