On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.03.2017 20:32, schrieb Colin King:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> >
> > There is no need to check if ret is non-zero, remove this
> > redundant check and just return the error status from the call
> > to mt9m114_write_reg_array.
> >
> > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1416577 ("Identical code for
> > different branches")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/mt9m114.c | 6 +-----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > index 8762124..a555aec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > @@ -444,12 +444,8 @@ static int mt9m114_set_suspend(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > static int mt9m114_init_common(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > {
> > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> > - int ret;
> >
> > - ret = mt9m114_write_reg_array(client, mt9m114_common, PRE_POLLING);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > - return ret;
> > + return mt9m114_write_reg_array(client, mt9m114_common, PRE_POLLING);
> > }
>
>
> any use for "client" ?
I guess the code would be on two lines in any case. It looks like a nice
decomposition as is.
julia
