On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's unusual to have error checking like (ret <= 0) in cases when > counting GPIO resources. In case when it's mandatory we propagate the > error (-ENOENT), otherwise we don't use the result. > > This makes consistent behaviour across all possible variants called in > gpiod_count(). > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Mika/Rafael, can you look at this patch? (Andy: sorry for late reply, busy merge window...) Yours, Linus Walleij
