On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:07:33PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:11 +0100, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:57:44 +0100
> > Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I was more than a bit surprised that mainline did this well, considering
> > > that the proggy was one someone posted long time ago to demonstrate
> > > starvation issues with the interactivity estimator.  (source not
> > > available unfortunately, was apparently still on my old PIII box along
> > > with the one Willy posted when I installed opensuse 10.2 on it.  damn.
> > > trivial thing though)
> > 
> > This one?  :)
> 
> No, but that one went to bit heaven too ;-)

Mike, if you need my old scheddos, I can resend it to you as well as to
any people working on the scheduler and asking for it. Although trivial,
I'm a bit reluctant to publish it to the whole world because I suspect
that distros based on older kernels are still vulnerable and the fixes
may not be easy. Anyway, it has absolutely no effect on non-interactive
schedulers.

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to