On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices > are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a > I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and > that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>. > > But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have a > OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF. > > The compatible strings don't have a vendor prefix because that's how it's > used currently, and changing this will be a Device Tree ABI break. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com> > --- > > drivers/mfd/tps6105x.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
Likewise. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps6105x.c b/drivers/mfd/tps6105x.c > index baa12ea666fb..29f86b8eebc5 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps6105x.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps6105x.c > @@ -173,9 +173,17 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tps6105x_id[] = { > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps6105x_id); > > +static const struct of_device_id tps6105x_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "tps61050" }, > + { .compatible = "tps61052" }, > + { }, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps6105x_of_match); > + > static struct i2c_driver tps6105x_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "tps6105x", > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(tps6105x_of_match), > }, > .probe = tps6105x_probe, > .remove = tps6105x_remove, -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog