On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:19:01AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:

> > -   wm8960->bclk = snd_soc_params_to_bclk(params);
> > +   wm8960->bclk = params_physical_width(params) *
> > +           params_channels(params) * params_rate(params);
> >     if (params_channels(params) == 1)
> >             wm8960->bclk *= 2;

> Would quite like to see Mark's thoughts on this. Feels a bit to
> me (although I am not certain) like we are solving the problem in
> the wrong place, isn't this really setting the desired BCLK and
> then in wm8960_configure_clocking we should set the lowest BCLK
> we can that is greater than or equal to the desired.

Exactly, this is the wrong fix in the wrong place - if this is something
we want to do we should be doing it in the shared functions so all
CODECs get the same behaviour but really I think Charles' suggestion
makes more sense.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to