On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:43:29PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
> On 20 March 2017 at 15:36, Fu Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 18 March 2017 at 02:05, Mark Rutland <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:50:03AM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >>> +static u32 arch_timer_get_mmio_freq(void __iomem *cntbase)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Try to get the frequency from the CNTFRQ of timer frame
> >>> registers.
> >>> + * Note: please verify cntbase in caller.
> >>> + */
> >>> + return readl_relaxed(cntbase + CNTFRQ);
> >>> +}
> >>
> >> Wrapping the MMIO read makes sense if we're going to do this in more
> >> than one place, so I'm happy with this wrapper.
> >>
> >> If you can s/arch_timer_get_mmio_freq/arch_timer_get_cntfrq/, and drop
> >
> > sorry, May I guess that is
> > "s/arch_timer_get_mmio_freq/arch_timer_get_mmio_cntfrq/"
> > or
> > "s/arch_timer_get_mmio_freq/arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq/"
> >
> > which one do you prefer? :-)
>
> keeping using arch_timer_get_cntfrq(); for per-CPU arch timer, then
>
> +static u32 arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(void __iomem *cntbase)
> +{
> + return readl_relaxed(cntbase + CNTFRQ);
> +}
> +
That looks perfect to me.
Sorry for the confusion above!
Mark.
