in_interrupt() semantics are confusing and wrong for most users as it also returns true when bh is disabled. Thus we open coded a proper check for interrupts in __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() with a lengthy explanatory comment.
Use the new in_task() predicate instead. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Cc: James Morse <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Popov <[email protected]> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] --- kernel/kcov.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kcov.c b/kernel/kcov.c index 85e5546cd791..cd771993f96f 100644 --- a/kernel/kcov.c +++ b/kernel/kcov.c @@ -60,15 +60,8 @@ void notrace __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(void) /* * We are interested in code coverage as a function of a syscall inputs, * so we ignore code executed in interrupts. - * The checks for whether we are in an interrupt are open-coded, because - * 1. We can't use in_interrupt() here, since it also returns true - * when we are inside local_bh_disable() section. - * 2. We don't want to use (in_irq() | in_serving_softirq() | in_nmi()), - * since that leads to slower generated code (three separate tests, - * one for each of the flags). */ - if (!t || (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_OFFSET - | NMI_MASK))) + if (!t || !in_task()) return; mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode); if (mode == KCOV_MODE_TRACE) { -- 2.12.1.500.gab5fba24ee-goog
