On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:23:41PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote: > The PELT decay_load comments are a bit confusing, first of all > the 1/2^N should be (1/2)^N so that the reader doesn't get confused.
I'm thinking you're confused. They're identical. (1/2)^N = (2^-1)^N = 2^-N = 1/2^N > Secondly, the y^N splitting into a 2-part decay factor deserves > a better explanation. This patch improves the comments. I find its actually harder to read.
