On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 10:08 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@intel.com> > > This patch flips the logic we were using to determine if the busy polling > has timed out. The main motivation for this is that we will need to > support two different possible timeout values in the future and by > recording the start time rather than when we would want to end we can focus > on making the end_time specific to the task be it epoll or socket based > polling. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@intel.com> > ---
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> Thanks guys !
