On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:24 AM, SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: >> However, I agree with Casey that this patch is mostly just code churn >> so I'm going to drop this from your series. > > How do you think about to return only constant error codes in this function? > Would it be acceptable to replace any statements “goto out;” with > “return -ENOMEM;” here instead?
Yes. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
