Hi Daniel,
On 29 March 2017 at 11:41, Fu Wei <fu....@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Great thanks for your review, allow me to answer your question below:
>
> On 28 March 2017 at 22:58, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:31:13AM +0800, fu....@linaro.org wrote:
>>> From: Fu Wei <fu....@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Currently, the counter frequency detection call(arch_timer_detect_rate)
>>> includes getting the frequency from the device-tree property, the per-cpu
>>> arch-timer and the memory-mapped (MMIO) timer interfaces.
>>> But reading device-tree property will be needed only when system boot with
>>> device-tree, and reading from the per-cpu arch-timer and the memory-mapped
>>> (MMIO) timer interfaces will be needed only when the system initializes
>>> the relevant timer.
>>>
>>> This patch separates out device-tree code, keep them in device-tree init
>>> function, and removes arch_timer_detect_rate founction, then uses the
>>> arch_timer_get_cntfrq and arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq directly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu....@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 58
>>> +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> index 843f923..29ca7d6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -560,30 +560,6 @@ static u32 arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(void __iomem
>>> *cntbase)
>>> return readl_relaxed(cntbase + CNTFRQ);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void
>>> -arch_timer_detect_rate(void __iomem *cntbase, struct device_node *np)
>>> -{
>>> - /* Who has more than one independent system counter? */
>>> - if (arch_timer_rate)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * Try to determine the frequency from the device tree or CNTFRQ,
>>> - * if ACPI is enabled, get the frequency from CNTFRQ ONLY.
>>> - */
>>> - if (!acpi_disabled ||
>>> - of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate)) {
>>> - if (cntbase)
>>> - arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(cntbase);
>>> - else
>>> - arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Check the timer frequency. */
>>> - if (arch_timer_rate == 0)
>>> - pr_warn("frequency not available\n");
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static void arch_timer_banner(unsigned type)
>>> {
>>> pr_info("%s%s%s timer(s) running at %lu.%02luMHz (%s%s%s).\n",
>>> @@ -958,7 +934,17 @@ static int __init arch_timer_of_init(struct
>>> device_node *np)
>>> for (i = ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_SECURE_PPI; i < ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI;
>>> i++)
>>> arch_timer_ppi[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
>>>
>>> - arch_timer_detect_rate(NULL, np);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Try to determine the frequency from the device tree,
>>> + * if fail, get the frequency from the sysreg CNTFRQ.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!arch_timer_rate &&
>>
>> This variable is set only if "arm,armv7-timer" and "arm,armv7-timer-mem" are
>> declared together in the DT, right ?
>>
>> Two declarations for a single variable ? Ignore the !arch_timer_rate.
>
> In this function, we try to initialize per-CPU arm arch_timer by DT.
> this "!arch_timer_rate" is for testing that if we have got system
> counter frequency from the memory-mapped timer. If so, we just skip
> getting the frequency from DT or sysreg cntfrq again.
> This variable is set only if "arm,armv7-timer-mem" is initialized
> earlier than "arm,armv7-timer", in another word, maybe the node of
> "arm,armv7-timer-mem" is declared earlier than "arm,armv7-timer-mem"
> one in DT.
>
> we do this check is for keeping the same init logic as before in the
> DT, try to avoid any possibility of breaking devices which boot by
> DT.
>
>>
>>> + of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate))
>>> + arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
>>> + if (!arch_timer_rate) {
>>> + pr_err(FW_BUG "frequency not available.\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Please, clarify this block, the conditions are unclear.
>
> this "!arch_timer_rate" is for verifying that if the system counter
> frequency we just got from DT or sysreg cntfrq is valid(non-zero).
>
> So here, you can see I check arch_timer_rate twice, but they are for
> different cases.
I think about this several times,
For this block, it is a little unclear, so I think this will be better:
+ /*
+ * Try to determine the frequency:
+ * If we have got it in arch_timer_mem_of_init, we don't need to get
it again, skip.
+ * Otherwise, try to get the frequency from the device tree,
+ * if fail, try to get it from the sysreg CNTFRQ.
+ * Last, verify the arch_timer_rate before leaving this block.
+ */
+ if (!arch_timer_rate) {
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate))
+ arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
+ if (!arch_timer_rate) {
+ pr_err(FW_BUG "frequency not available.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
>
>>
>>>
>>> arch_timer_c3stop = !of_property_read_bool(np, "always-on");
>>>
>>> @@ -1069,7 +1055,19 @@ static int __init arch_timer_mem_init(struct
>>> device_node *np)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - arch_timer_detect_rate(base, np);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Try to determine the frequency from the device tree,
>>> + * if fail, get the frequency from the CNTFRQ reg of MMIO timer.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!arch_timer_rate &&
>>> + of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &arch_timer_rate))
>>> + arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_mem_get_cntfrq(base);
>>> + if (!arch_timer_rate) {
>>> + pr_err(FW_BUG "MMIO frequency not available.\n");
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> ret = arch_timer_mem_register(base, irq);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -1130,8 +1128,12 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct
>>> acpi_table_header *table)
>>> map_generic_timer_interrupt(gtdt->non_secure_el2_interrupt,
>>> gtdt->non_secure_el2_flags);
>>>
>>> - /* Get the frequency from CNTFRQ */
>>> - arch_timer_detect_rate(NULL, NULL);
>>> + /* Get the frequency from the sysreg CNTFRQ */
>>> + arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
>>> + if (!arch_timer_rate) {
>>> + pr_err(FW_BUG "frequency not available.\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> arch_timer_uses_ppi = arch_timer_select_ppi();
>>> if (!arch_timer_ppi[arch_timer_uses_ppi]) {
>>> --
>>> 2.9.3
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Fu Wei
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat
