On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>
> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <[email protected]>
> ---
Applied to next/fixes-non-critical in arm-soc, I don't think anybody else
was going to apply it. Thanks!
Arnd
