On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:09:22 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, I am a bit concerned about idle-entry latency... > > > > > > > Which should now be fine because of the inlined this_cpu_inc/dec() > > which is very efficient and made for fast paths like this. > > OK, I am willing to let people complain if they can measure the > difference. If they can measure the difference, there are some things > we can do.
Again, I was getting this_cpu_inc/dec confused with __this_cpu_inc/dec. I'll update my patch to fix that. -- Steve
