On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 08:39:10AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Are you planning to get rid of scale_load_down() for weight because of > the correctness problems of the signal mentioned by Paul in this thread?
Yes; it would be good to (again) use all 20 bits of weight for the load_avg things. It was one of the reasons we went to 20 in the first place after all. The patch was a quick draft and known broken, but thanks for having a look.
