On 2017/4/11 8:13, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Now we're doing SSR aggressively more than ever before, so once we reach to
> the reserved_segment, f2fs_balance_fs will call f2fs_gc, which triggers
> checkpoint everytime. We actually must avoid that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index e2f9b2b12b74..4a720f3394d9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -966,7 +966,11 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, bool 
> background)
>                * threshold, we can make them free by checkpoint. Then, we
>                * secure free segments which doesn't need fggc any more.
>                */
> -             ret = write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
> +             if (prefree_segments(sbi)) {
> +                     ret = write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
> +                     if (ret)
> +                             goto stop;
> +             }
>               if (ret)
>                       goto stop;

We don't need redundant check here?

Otherwise, this patchset looks good to me, anyway please add:

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>

Thanks,

>               if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0))
> 

Reply via email to