On 20-03-17, 15:02, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > The main feedback I got for the V3 series came from Kevin, who suggested > that we should reuse OPP tables for genpd devices as well, instead of > creating a new table type. And that's what this version is trying to do. > > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is > pretty much platform dependent and we may need to work with a wide range > of configurables. For some platforms, like Qcom, it can be a positive > integer value alone, while in other cases it can be voltage levels, etc. > > The power-domain framework until now was only designed for the idle > state management of the device and this needs to change in order to > reuse the power-domain framework for active state management of the > devices.
Hi Ulf/Kevin, Over 3 weeks since the time this version was posted :( Can we get some reviews of this stuff and decide on how we are supposed to proceed on this ? Its getting delayed a lot unnecessarily. Thanks. -- viresh
