On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:07:16 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > OK, will optimize it a bit. When are you planning to get this in? > > > > > > > Well, I added the use case for synchronize_rcu_tasks() in my current > > for-next. I'll have to make sure I get the schedule_idle() in as well > > as my update to the event benchmark thread as well. > > > > I don't think anything will truly break without it yet. But that's > > assuming there's not another kernel thread somewhere that just spins > > calling schedule. > > > > And this patch will still speed up those that do call > > synchronize_rcu_tasks(). But that's an optimization and not really a > > fix. > > The upcoming v4.12 merge window, then? Yep. -- Steve
