On 2017-04-15 18:12, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2017-04-16 0:53 GMT+08:00 Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>:
>> On 2017-04-15 07:52, Axel Lin wrote:
>>> The commit "regulator: rn5t618: Add RN5T567 PMIC support" added
>>> RN5T618_DCDC4 to the enum, then RN5T618_REG_NUM is also changed.
>>> So for rn5t618, there is out of bounds array access when checking
>>> regulators[i].name in the for loop.
>>
>> I use designated initializers ([RN5T618_##rid] = {..), which guarantee
>> that the non initialized elements are zero. The highest element LDORTC2
>> is defined, hence the length of the array should be RN5T618_REG_NUM.
>
> ok, I missed that. Then current code is fine.
> Though the meaing of RN5T618_REG_NUM seems misleading to me as different
> variant has differnt number of regulators.
Yeah I admit the code is somewhat unobvious as it is now. But it allowed
me to add RN5T567 support without changing the existing array and the
preprocessor macro.
--
Stefan
