On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 03:46:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:49:40AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> > 
> > perf mem report doesn't display the data source snoop indication correctly.
> > 
> > In the kernel API the definition is
> 
> missing something?

#define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_NONE     0x02 /* no snoop */
#define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_HIT      0x04 /* snoop hit */
#define PERF_MEM_SNOOP_MISS     0x08 /* snoop miss */

>  
> > but the table used by the perf tools exchanged Hit and Miss
> > 
> >         "None",
> >         "Miss",
> >         "Hit",
> > 
> > Fix the table in perf.
> > 
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> > index 1d4ab53c60ca..865ba3c39284 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> > @@ -205,8 +205,8 @@ int perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, 
> > struct mem_info *mem_info)
> >  static const char * const snoop_access[] = {
> >     "N/A",
> >     "None",
> > -   "Miss",
> >     "Hit",
> > +   "Miss",
> >     "HitM",
> >  };
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3

Reply via email to