On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Djalal Harouni <tix...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: >> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 14:44 +0200, Djalal Harouni wrote: >>> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> >>> > wrote: >>> > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 00:20 +0200, Djalal Harouni wrote: >>> > [...] > [...] >>> modules_disabled is too restrictive and once set it can't be changed, >>> maybe that's why not all users use it. >>> >>> With modules_disabled=0 and modules_autoload=2 >> [...] >> >> Hmm, OK. How about naming this modules_autoload_mode, then, so that >> it's obviously not a boolean? > > Yes that's fine by me, kees already suggested to rename it to > "modules_autoload" I can change it to that if it's the best > suggestion!
That's fine by me. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security