On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:45:23 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:

> We had an incorrect backport of
> 4591243102fa ("clk: at91: usb: propagate rate modification to the parent clk")
> that was fixed incorrectly in linux-3.18.y by
> 76723e7ed589 ("clk: at91: usb: fix determine_rate prototype")
> 
> as shown by this warning:
> 
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c:155:20: warning: initialization from incompatible 
> pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c:193:20: warning: initialization from incompatible 
> pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 
> This should fix it properly.
> 
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>

Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
> This should be applied to 3.18.y directly
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
> index 0283a5713d6c..930a424cc4a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static unsigned long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_recalc_rate(struct 
> clk_hw *hw,
>  static long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>                                             unsigned long rate,
>                                             unsigned long *best_parent_rate,
> -                                           struct clk_hw **best_parent_hw)
> +                                           struct clk **best_parent_hw)
>  {
>       struct clk *parent = NULL;
>       long best_rate = -EINVAL;
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw 
> *hw,
>                               best_rate = tmp_rate;
>                               best_diff = tmp_diff;
>                               *best_parent_rate = tmp_parent_rate;
> -                             *best_parent_hw = __clk_get_hw(parent);
> +                             *best_parent_hw = parent;
>                       }
>  
>                       if (!best_diff || tmp_rate < rate)

Reply via email to