On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> wrote: > I was trying to figure out what how flush_tlb_current_task() would > possibly work correctly if current->mm != current->active_mm, but I > realized I could spare myself the effort: it has no callers except > the unused flush_tlb() macro. In fact, it doesn't even exist on > !SMP builds.
Please disregard this patch for now. It has issues. ---Andy
