On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 02:22:48PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Really? What possible problems can occur? The worst that occurs to > me is that if someone forgets to call the commit function, the kprobes > will still be disabled, but memory won't be recycled for a while.
Exactly. It's a very unintuitive interface, exposing implementation details to the user. The array variant otoh is obvious to the user: gice me an array of probes to register/unregister and do it. > Would it be possible to allay even that concern with an automated > deferred/periodic commit? That's even worse from the user perspective interface. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
