Hi Fengguang, Thanks for pointing it out!
I am fine with defining mem_avoid_memmap_index it as static variable. While Liyang suggested using a local static inside mem_avoid_memmap, then mem_avoid_memmap_index is not needed any more. Do you think it's OK to you? Thanks Baoquan On 04/24/17 at 04:48pm, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> > --- > kaslr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c > b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c > index 6649ecd..7190d35 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct mem_vector { > #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS 4 > > static bool memmap_too_large; > -int mem_avoid_memmap_index; > +static int mem_avoid_memmap_index; > extern unsigned long get_cmd_line_ptr(void); > >