On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:32:25 +0200
Radim Krčmář <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> 
> Marc Zyngier suggested that we define the arch specific VCPU request
> base, rather than requiring each arch to remember to start from 8.
> That suggestion, along with Radim Krčmář's recent VCPU request flag
> addition, snowballed into defining something of an arch VCPU request
> defining API.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> (Looks like x86 is running out of arch VCPU request bits.  Maybe
>  someday we'll need to extend to 64.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 ++--
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |  6 ++---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h     | 44 
> ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h            |  8 +++++++
>  6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>

Reply via email to