On Tue, 9 May 2017 17:11:10 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:

> RT has a problem when the wait on a futex/rtmutex got interrupted by a
> timeout or a signal. task->pi_blocked_on is still set when returning from
> rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(). The task must acquire the hash bucket lock
> after this.
> 
> If the hash bucket lock is contended then the
> BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on)) in
> task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() will trigger.
> 
> This can be avoided by clearing task->pi_blocked_on in the return path of
> rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() which removes the task from the boosting chain
> of the rtmutex. That's correct because the task is not longer blocked on

 s/not/no/

> it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Engleder Gerhard <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/rtmutex.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -2380,6 +2380,7 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_m
>                              struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
>                              struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
>  {
> +     struct task_struct *tsk = current;
>       int ret;
>  
>       raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
> @@ -2389,6 +2390,22 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_m
>       /* sleep on the mutex */
>       ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter, NULL);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * RT has a problem here when the wait got interrupted by a timeout
> +      * or a signal. task->pi_blocked_on is still set. The task must
> +      * acquire the hash bucket lock when returning from this function.
> +      *
> +      * If the hash bucket lock is contended then the
> +      * BUG_ON(rt_mutex_real_waiter(task->pi_blocked_on)) in
> +      * task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() will trigger. This can be avoided by
> +      * clearing task->pi_blocked_on which removes the task from the
> +      * boosting chain of the rtmutex. That's correct because the task
> +      * is not longer blocked on it.

  s/not/no/


I looked at the users of pi_blocked_on, and this appears to be fine.
I don't see it used by remove_waiter() where it clears it at the start.

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>

-- Steve


> +      */
> +     raw_spin_lock(&tsk->pi_lock);
> +     tsk->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
> +     raw_spin_unlock(&tsk->pi_lock);
> +
>       raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
>  
>       return ret;

Reply via email to