On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:51:18 -0700 David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 1:06 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 4 2007 12:00, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > >> +static int __init fpga_init(void)
> > >> +{
> > >> + if (machine_is_omap_h4()
> > >> + || machine_is_omap_h3()
> > >> + || machine_is_omap_h2()
> > >> + || machine_is_omap_perseus2()
> > >> + )
> > >
> > >Perhaps there is nothing in CodingStyle for if () continuation
> > >lines. Looks like it is needed. This is ETOOMUCHINDENTATION by
> > >at least one tab. Should be more like:
> > >
> > >+ if (machine_is_omap_h4()
> > >+ || machine_is_omap_h3()
> > >+ || machine_is_omap_h2()
> > >+ || machine_is_omap_perseus2())
> >
> > My stance, || goes at EOL, and final ) not standalone:
>
> You are still violating the "only TABs used for indent" rule.
Yes, but CodingStyle is a just set of guidelines and common practices.
It doesn't cover multi-line if () statements, which is the subject of
the current controvers^W discussion.
> > if (foo ||
> > bar ||
> > baz ||
> > etc)
> > do_something;
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
