On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >> Avoids reimplementation of DMI matching in intel_quark_i2c_setup. > > What's wrong with current approach? I suppose this will make sense > when we will have an issue / impediment. Right now it looks like > over-engineering. > > (Yes, I know what I said to you about this earlier, OTOH see above) >
It allows matching on additional DMI tags without additional code - patch 2 depends on it. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
