Hi Andrew, I am attaching the additional patch to make it work for ARMv5 as well. Let me know if you find any issues with this.
Please apply 0002-Editted-for-ARMv5-compilation.patch after applying the first patch. Best, Shubham Bansal On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03:53AM +0530, Shubham Bansal wrote: >> The JIT compiler emits ARM 32 bit instructions. Currently, It supports >> eBPF only. Classic BPF is supported because of the conversion by BPF >> core. > > make mvebu_v5_defconfig > > make -s -j 16 > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function emit_rev16: > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1019:7: error: implicit declaration of function > ARM_MOV_S [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > emit(ARM_MOV_S(tmp2[0], rn, SRTYPE_LSR, 8), ctx); > ^~~~~~~~~ > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function emit_rev32: > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1037:36: error: macro "ARM_MOV_I" passed 3 > arguments, but takes just 2 > emit(ARM_MOV_I(tmp2[1], rn, 0xff00), ctx); > ^ > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1037:7: error: ARM_MOV_I undeclared (first use in > this function) > emit(ARM_MOV_I(tmp2[1], rn, 0xff00), ctx); > ^~~~~~~~~ > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1037:7: note: each undeclared identifier is > reported only once for each function it appears in > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1039:41: error: macro "ARM_MOV_I" passed 3 > arguments, but takes just 2 > emit(ARM_MOV_I(tmp2[0], tmp2[0], 0xff00), ctx); > ^ > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function build_insn: > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1393:30: error: macro "ARM_AND_R" requires 3 > arguments, but only 2 given > emit(ARM_AND_R(rt, tmp2[1]), ctx); > ^ > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:1393:9: error: ARM_AND_R undeclared (first use in > this function) > emit(ARM_AND_R(rt, tmp2[1]), ctx); > > Andrew
0002-Editted-for-ARMv5-compilation.patch
Description: Binary data