On Thu, May 25 2017, Ian Abbott wrote: > Correct these checkpatch.pl warnings: > > |WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines > |#34: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:34: > |+/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a > |+ result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used > > |WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line > |#36: FILE: include/linux/bug.h:36: > |+ aren't permitted). */ > > Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]> > Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <[email protected]> > --- > v5: Actually, there was no v1 thru v4. I called this v5 to match the > series. > --- > include/linux/bug.h | 10 ++++++---- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h > index 687b557fc5eb..ca24007e2dc3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/bug.h > +++ b/include/linux/bug.h > @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ struct pt_regs; > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2(n) \ > BUILD_BUG_ON((n) == 0 || (((n) & ((n) - 1)) != 0)) > > -/* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a > - result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used > - e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions > - aren't permitted). */ > +/* > + * Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a > + * result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can be used > + * e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma expressions > + * aren't permitted). > + */ > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) > #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) -- Best regards ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ «If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»
