On 25/05/17 15:07, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just propose the binding yourself. >> > My proposed binding is what already exists. Zero change. > I offer to adapt your driver for you, if you are too busy to do it yourself. >
Care to explain how with the example I gave ? BIT(0) - SCPI BIT(1) - SCMI (general) BIT(2) - SCMI (notification) BIT(3) - A totally new protocol : : The protocols drivers *has* to be independent as they are used with other mailbox controllers. I can do the changes, but I would like to know how. -- Regards, Sudeep
