From: Kees Cook <[email protected]> The remaining users of __sem_free() can simply call kvfree() instead for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> [[email protected]: Rediff to keep rcu protection for security_sem_alloc()] Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]> --- ipc/sem.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index 5f13773..9e70cd7 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -258,18 +258,13 @@ static void merge_queues(struct sem_array *sma) } } -static void __sem_free(struct sem_array *sma) -{ - kvfree(sma); -} - static void sem_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head) { struct kern_ipc_perm *p = container_of(head, struct kern_ipc_perm, rcu); struct sem_array *sma = container_of(p, struct sem_array, sem_perm); security_sem_free(sma); - __sem_free(sma); + kvfree(sma); } /* @@ -500,7 +495,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params) sma->sem_perm.security = NULL; retval = security_sem_alloc(sma); if (retval) { - __sem_free(sma); + kvfree(sma); return retval; } -- 2.9.3
