On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > >> > > So that yields: >> > > >> > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> > > it >> > > * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the >> > > Free >> > > * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or at your >> > > option) any >> > > * later version; or, when distributed separately from the Linux kernel >> > > or >> > > * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the >> > >> > You have more )s there than (s. >> >> Thanks just removed that pesky ) >> >> > Can you get rid of the "when distributed separately from the Linux >> > kernel or incorporated into other software packages," wording? I'm not >> > exactly sure what it is trying to say, and if it limits the license >> > below in any way. >> >> I had to pick an "or language" used already upstream and which folks were OK >> with, this was one and I went with it. I prefer it as it makes it clear the >> intent is outside of Linux I wish copyleft-next to apply. > > Yes, the intent is clear. What is not clear is if the intent is > legally binding.
Code already is upstream (Xen) with this sort of or language. I think that's sufficient for me, unless of course you have something better to recommend. Luis
