On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:42:16PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The scan_block() function updates the number of references (pointers) to
> objects, adding them to the gray_list when object->min_count is reached.
> The patch factors out this functionality into a separate update_refs()
> function.
> 
> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/kmemleak.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 964b12eba2c1..266482f460c2 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -1188,6 +1188,30 @@ static bool update_checksum(struct kmemleak_object 
> *object)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Update an object's references. object->lock must be held by the caller.
> + */
> +static void update_refs(struct kmemleak_object *object)
> +{
> +     if (!color_white(object)) {
> +             /* non-orphan, ignored or new */
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Increase the object's reference count (number of pointers to the
> +      * memory block). If this count reaches the required minimum, the
> +      * object's color will become gray and it will be added to the
> +      * gray_list.
> +      */
> +     object->count++;
> +     if (color_gray(object)) {
> +             /* put_object() called when removing from gray_list */
> +             WARN_ON(!get_object(object));
> +             list_add_tail(&object->gray_list, &gray_list);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * Memory scanning is a long process and it needs to be interruptable. This
>   * function checks whether such interrupt condition occurred.
>   */
> @@ -1259,24 +1283,7 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
>                * enclosed by scan_mutex.
>                */
>               spin_lock_nested(&object->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> -             if (!color_white(object)) {
> -                     /* non-orphan, ignored or new */
> -                     spin_unlock(&object->lock);
> -                     continue;
> -             }
> -
> -             /*
> -              * Increase the object's reference count (number of pointers
> -              * to the memory block). If this count reaches the required
> -              * minimum, the object's color will become gray and it will be
> -              * added to the gray_list.
> -              */
> -             object->count++;
> -             if (color_gray(object)) {
> -                     /* put_object() called when removing from gray_list */
> -                     WARN_ON(!get_object(object));
> -                     list_add_tail(&object->gray_list, &gray_list);
> -             }
> +             update_refs(object);
>               spin_unlock(&object->lock);

FWIW, I've tested this patchset and I don't see kmemleak triggering the
false positives anymore.

I've also done a quick review and couldn't find anything obviously
incorrect, just a question: why didn't you moved the spin_lock/unlock into
update_refs() too?  It would save you 2 lines in the next patch :)

Cheers,
--
Luís


>       }
>       read_unlock_irqrestore(&kmemleak_lock, flags);
> 

Reply via email to