Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> writes: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> Sure. It would be nice to move ->children into signal_struct at first. >> Except this change breaks (in fact fixes) ->pdeath_signal behaviour. > > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays has > probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks :/
Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group, or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names. I remember last time the conversation about renaming it came up no one had a good name for it that wasn't already taken. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
