This is a minor correctness fix: since the at91_cf driver probe() routine
is in the init section, it should use platform_driver_probe() instead of
leaving that pointer around in the driver struct after init section removal.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This is a refresh of a patch sent to the linux-pcmcia list on 15-February;
it seems that despite the MAINTAINERS file, that's not the place to send
patches. (So what good is that list, and why is it in MAINTAINERS?)
Index: at91/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c
===================================================================
--- at91.orig/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c 2007-02-15 18:20:53.000000000 -0800
+++ at91/drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c 2007-02-15 18:31:27.000000000 -0800
@@ -360,7 +360,6 @@ static struct platform_driver at91_cf_dr
.name = (char *) driver_name,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
- .probe = at91_cf_probe,
.remove = __exit_p(at91_cf_remove),
.suspend = at91_cf_suspend,
.resume = at91_cf_resume,
@@ -370,7 +369,7 @@ static struct platform_driver at91_cf_dr
static int __init at91_cf_init(void)
{
- return platform_driver_register(&at91_cf_driver);
+ return platform_driver_probe(&at91_cf_driver, at91_cf_probe);
}
module_init(at91_cf_init);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
